Mannheimer Bros. v. Kansas Casualty & Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $14,484.27. The ease was tried before Dickson, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff for $7,301.92. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment both parties appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
The f-aots in this case -are not in dispute in any substantial respect. Defendant in due course issued to plaintiff its insurance policy, thereby agreeing for the consideration paid to indemnify plaintiff for any loss or injury occasioned to third persons from the operation of plaintiff’s auto delivery truck in the city of St. Paul. There was subsequently a collision between the truck and an automobile in which one Hillstrom -and one Hanscom were riding, resulting in serious injury to both. They thereafter brought separate suits against plaintiff, charging in their complaints as the basis of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hillstrom v. Mannheimer Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Mannheimer Bros. v. Kansas Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Mitchell v. DaviesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
3Cited by45 opinions
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Hogan v. Midland National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Larry Luke, Individually v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Larry Luke, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, Mich. v. Winget Winget v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, MichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.