Legal Opinion

Howe v. Tucker

California Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1933No. Docket No. Sac. 4774PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

For a chronological statement of the facts herein reference is hereby made to the opinion of this court on a petition for supersedeas in the cause entitled Tucker v. Howe, 217 Cal. 23 [17 Pac. (2d) 103],

Appellants properly state the sole legal question involved as follows: “Is an action for the cancellation, upon the grounds of fraud and undue influence of, or for the determination of a trust in, a note and a deed of trust securing the note, in which deed of trust the trustee therein named is a person other than the payee of the note, a transitory action so that venue of the trial thereof…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Brown v. Happy Valley Fruit Growers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. Royal Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Warner v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Goossen v. CliftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Vaughan v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Turlock Theatre Co. v. LawsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Bardwell v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API