Howe v. Tucker
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
For a chronological statement of the facts herein reference is hereby made to the opinion of this court on a petition for supersedeas in the cause entitled Tucker v. Howe, 217 Cal. 23 [17 Pac. (2d) 103],
Appellants properly state the sole legal question involved as follows: “Is an action for the cancellation, upon the grounds of fraud and undue influence of, or for the determination of a trust in, a note and a deed of trust securing the note, in which deed of trust the trustee therein named is a person other than the payee of the note, a transitory action so that venue of the trial thereof…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Brown v. Happy Valley Fruit Growers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. Royal Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Warner v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Goossen v. CliftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Vaughan v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Turlock Theatre Co. v. LawsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Bardwell v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.