Legal Opinion

Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Wright

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1922PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green

This is a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (chapter 123 of the Acts of 1919). The plaintiff below was a steel worker in the employ of defendant railway, and lost his eye while engaged in the railway company’s service. There was a statutory award in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendant appealed in error to this court.

The employee was engaged with two other men in straightening an iron bar on the door of a freight car. He was holding a daddy maul against one side of the bar, another employee held a flatter against the other side, and a third employee was striking the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wick v. GunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. State v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Bersch v. Morris & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ezell v. TiptonTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Hotelling v. Fargo-Western Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Mullins v. Tennessee Stave & Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. McKenzie Tank Lines, Inc. v. McCauleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. J. Harold Cagle, Individually and as Next-Friend and Guardian of Todd Lee Cagle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API