Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1907PublishedCited by 20 opinions

PROM BLEDSOE. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Bledsoe County. — Joseph C. Higgins, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

The indictment in this case charged that the plaintiff in error “on the-day of April, 1906, and on divers other days prior to that date, and up to the finding of this indictment, in the State and county aforesaid, did unlawfully, knowingly, willfully, and feloniously cut and remove from said tract of land” (previously described in the indictment) “timber growing upon said *524land, for the purpose of marketing the same, without the consent of said John G. Myers and William 0. Johnson, the owners in fee of said tract of land, contrary to the said form of the statute in such case made and provided,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Whitman v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Young v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ezell v. TiptonTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  2. State of Oregon v. DoudOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Daniels v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State v. SummersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  5. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1922

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API