Legal Opinion

Mullins v. Tennessee Stave & Lumber Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1927PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

Mrs. Mullins instituted this suit under the Workmen’s Compensation Statute against the Tennessee Stave & Lumber Company, G-eorge Jackson and A. Laxton to recover compensation for the death of her husband, George Mullins.

The trial court dismissed the suit as to the Tennessee Stave & Lumber Company, but entered judgment against Jackson and Laxton for $8 per week for four hundred weeks.

Jackson and Laxton have appealed, and Mrs. Mullins has filed the record for writ of error.

Mrs. Mullins assigns two errors. First, that the suit should not have been dismissed as to the Stave & Lumber Company; and,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Equalization v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Patterson Transfer Co. v. LewisTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Darnell v. McNicholsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  3. McKenzie v. Campbell and Dann Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Whitehurst v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  5. Johnson v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1949

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API