Legal Opinion

Ezell v. Tipton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1924PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

L. G-. Ezell filed his petition in the circuit court of Lake county under chapter 123 of the Acts of 1919, as amended by chapter 84 of the acts of 1923, known as the Workmen’s Compensation Act, seeking to recover compensation of the defendant, Hale C. Tipton, for an injury sustained by him while in the employ of defendant and working in his cotton gin at Tiptonville, Tenn.

Petitioner was employed by defendant in the capacity of a ginner, and on September 27, 1923, while cleaning-lint cotton from under the gin saws, which were in rapid motion, with a short stick, his hand was caught in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wick v. GunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. State v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Bohlen-Huse Coal & Ice Co. v. McDanielTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Bersch v. Morris & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Troy Mitchell v. Fayetteville Public UtilitiesTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Coleman v. CokerTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Hartwell Motor Co., Inc. v. HickersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Standard Surety & Casualty Co. of New York v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ElamTennessee Supreme Court · 1955

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API