Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Dusen

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 23, 2015No. 5ag/14PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

A lawyer must, at a minimum, be trustworthy. One who wants to be a lawyer in Maryland must disclose to the State Board of Law Examiners (“SBLE”) and this Court information that bears on that trait. Failure to satisfy those requirements may prevent admission to the bar or, when discovered, result in disbarment.

We have disbarred the newly-admitted lawyer who is the respondent in this disciplinary proceeding and now set forth the reasons why we took that action. To explain our decision, we need not catalog precisely what past indiscretions an applicant must recall and reveal in a bar…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheinbeinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SlateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. TryeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Attorney Grievance v. VasiliadesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. Attorney Grievance v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. OgilvieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API