Attorney Grievance v. Vasiliades
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Christopher Edward Vasiliades, Misc. Docket AG No. 10, September Term, 2020. Opinion by Hotten, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTIONS – DISBARMENT. Disbarment is the appropriate sanction for an attorney who violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct 19-308.1(b), 19-308.4(a), (b), (c), (d), and (e). Respondent’s conduct included intentional dishonesty during the bar admission process; criminal infractions and violation of protective orders that were not reported to the Attorney Grievance Commission; and disturbing content reflected in…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Attorney Grievance v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. FrammCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Attorney Grievance v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. TaniformCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. MaidenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. PierreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Application of Wright for Admission to the BarCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.