Legal Opinion

Wymer-Harris Construction Co. v. Glass

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1930No. 22056PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The parties will he referred to in the reverse order from which they appear here. The defendant, under a contract with the hoard of county commissioners of Mahoning county, was engaged in reflooring the Market street viaduct in the city of Youngstown. The plaintiff’s decedent was employed by the Republic Iron & Steel Company, whose office building, from an upper floor, led onto the easterly sidewalk of the viaduct, and such decedent, in leaving such office in the usual way, met his death by being struck by an automobile which was traveling in a northerly direction over the westerly side of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gorrell v. Greensboro Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Paducah Lumber Co. v. Paducah Water Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  3. Hall v. Scott's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Smith v. FlesherOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Freigy v. Gargaro Company, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Larson v. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Davis v. Nelson-Deppe, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. First Nat. Bank of Akron v. CannDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API