Legal Opinion

Amundsen v. Poppe

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 29, 1948No. 34,681PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Certiorari to review a decision of the industrial commission affirming a referee’s determination that relator was not within the coverage of the workmen’s compensation act on the basis of its finding that at the time of the injury relator’s employment was casual and not in the usual course of the trade, business, profession, or occupation of his then employer.

Relator, Helmer Amundsen, a carpenter by trade, filed his petition with the industrial commission to recover compensation alleged to be due him as a result of injuries to his back sustained on December 18,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schneider v. Salvation ArmySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Billmayer v. SanfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Eichholz v. ShaftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Colosimo v. GiacomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Sink v. PharaohSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Farnam v. Linden Hills Congregational ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Aleckson v. Kennedy Motor Sales Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Koktavy v. City of New PragueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Jerald Meyer v. Duluth Building Trades Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  5. Kolbeck v. MyhraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API