Legal Opinion

Colosimo v. Giacomo

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 7, 1937No. 31,191PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hilton, Justice.

Certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission affirming the findings of fact and alloivance of compensation and medical expenses made by the referee to the respondent, totaling about $186.

Frank Giacomo and Angelina Ferrara Giacomo, relators herein, are husband and wife. The latter acquired title to certain premises in January, 1934. The building thereon was in a dilapidated condition, and repairs were necessary to render it fit for occupancy. In May, 1934, relators undertook to repair the building in order that the husband might occupy the first floor as a beer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Nygaard v. Throndson BrothersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Gahr v. StroutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Amundsen v. PoppeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Kolbeck v. MyhraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Byhardt v. BallordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Chisholm v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  5. Flamingo Motor Inn v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API