Legal Opinion
Koktavy v. City of New Prague
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 16, 1956No. 36,754PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dell, Chief Justice.
Certiorari to review a decision of the Industrial Commission denying workmen’s compensation benefits to the relator, Joseph W.' Koktavy.
The relator is 53- years of age and is regularly employed as a linotype operator for the Suel Printing Company, the publishers of a weekly newspaper at New Prague. He also has been a member of the New Prague volunteer fire department for over 26 years, receiving compensation for his duties as secretary of the organization and for attending the monthly meetings.
For a number of years the volunteer fire department has been called on to fire…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- O'Rourke v. Percy Vittum Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Chellson v. State Division of Employment & SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Manley v. Harvey Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Rinne v. W. C. Griffis Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cuna v. Board of Fire CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Geerdes v. J. R. Watkins Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Kolbeck v. MyhraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Sandmeyer v. City of BemidjiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Carey v. StadtherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.