Legal Opinion
Schneider v. Salvation Army
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 19, 1944No. 33,747PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Streissguth, Justice.
Respondent was awarded compensation for injuries received while working in the “Men’s Social Service Department” of the relator Salvation Army at St. Paul. The only question presented is whether at the time he sustained his injuries he was an employe of the relator. The industrial commission so found, and the case is here on certiorwri.
The Salvation Army is a most worthy charitable organization. Its work is rooted in human needs. In general, its program is designed to offer aid and succor to destitute, homeless, and derelict members of society. To these it gratuitously…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Wass v. Bracker Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Matter of Hall v. Salvation ArmyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Hanson v. St. James Hotel & Union City MissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Caughman v. Columbia Y. M. C. A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
- Peplinski v. Fobe's Roofing, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Farnam v. Linden Hills Congregational ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Aleckson v. Kennedy Motor Sales Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Meyers v. Southwest Region Conference Ass'n of Seventh Day AdventistsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.