Legal Opinion
Sink v. Pharaoh
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 4, 1927No. 25,654PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hoi/P, J.
Certiorari to review a compensation award. Peter Sink, a carpenter, was hired by appellant to reshingle a small house owned by him in Minneapolis and was to be paid at the rate of 40 cents an hour. He began work on September 14, 1925. On September 16, while at work, the scaffold gave way and he fell, receiving injuries which caused death. The question presented is whether Sink and the employer were within the workmen’s compensation act. • All servants and masters are not within the protection of that act. Section 8 thereof (Gr. S. 1923, § 4268) provides: “This act shall not be…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Marsh v. GronerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Holbrook v. Olympia Hotel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Holmen Creamery Ass'n v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- State ex rel. Lennon v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Billmayer v. SanfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Shrout v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Amundsen v. PoppeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Jerald Meyer v. Duluth Building Trades Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Kolbeck v. MyhraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.