Legal Opinion

Gast Construction Co. v. Brighton Partnership

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1988No. Civ. 870339PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINE, Justice.

Brighton Partnership (Brighton) attempts to appeal from three orders: an order dismissing with prejudice its counterclaim against Gast Construction Co., Inc. (Gast); an order dismissing with prejudice its counterclaim against Rogers, Perlenfein & Associates (Rogers); and an order assessing attorney’s fees for bringing a frivolous motion for summary judgment. We dismiss the appeal.

Gast and Rogers commenced a lawsuit against Brighton to foreclose mechanic’s liens for services performed but not paid for. Brighton answered and counterclaimed. While the answer disputed the validity…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gillan v. SaffellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Herzog v. YuillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. Olson v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Phoenix Assurance Co. of Canada v. RunckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Brown v. WillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Peterson v. ZerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Investors Title Insurance Co. v. HerzigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Thompson v. GoetzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. B.H. v. K.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Mitchell v. SanbornNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API