Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Zerr
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 1989No. Civ. 880281PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
Tom Peterson appeals from a summary judgment which dismissed his action for tortious interference with contract and misrepresentation against Kurt Zerr and awarded Zerr attorney fees and costs. Peterson also appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to amend his complaint to include a breach of contract claim against Interstate Investments [Interstate], the remaining defendant in Peterson’s tor-tious interference and misrepresentation action. We hold that the Rule 54(b), N.D. R.Civ.P., order certifying the appeal of the summary judgment was improvidently granted and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Cullen v. MargiottaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Professor Harriet Spiegel v. The Trustees of Tufts CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Nicola Panichella v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, (Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc., a Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Peterson v. ZerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Investors Title Insurance Co. v. HerzigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Sime v. Tvenge Associates Architects & Planners, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Thompson v. GoetzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.