Legal Opinion

Phoenix Assurance Co. of Canada v. Runck

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1985No. Civ. 10596PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Justice.

Clayton E. Runck, Jr., and Herman Sobania 1 appealed from a district court judgment 2 against them and George Schulz in an action brought by several insurance companies to recover insurance proceeds paid to Runck, interest, and punitive damages. We affirm.

The trial court made the following findings of fact:

“3. In the fall of 1971 Runck purchased a building and the surrounding land located in Starbuck, Canada, and had the building and any contents insured under a policy of co-insurance subscribed to by the plaintiffs.
“5. After the purchase of the building and prior to December…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Builders Steel Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  3. Adams v. Little Missouri Minerals AssociationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Verry v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Schuh v. Allery Ex Rel. AlleryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gast Construction Co. v. Brighton PartnershipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hebron Public School District No. 13 of Morton County v. United States Gypsum Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Schmidt v. Grand Forks Country ClubNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Dvorak v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Beavers v. WaltersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API