Legal Opinion

Herzog v. Yuill

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1987No. Civil 11,189PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

James H. Herzog has appealed from partial summary judgments entered pursuant to certification under Rule 54(b), N.D.R. Civ.P., that dismissed most of his claims against William D. Yuill and all of his claims against William A. Hill. Yuill has cross-appealed from that portion of a judgment denying his motion for summary judgment of dismissal on all of Herzog’s claims. We affirm the judgments appealed from in part, reverse in part, and remand. We dismiss the cross-appeal.

On December 16, 1983, Herzog commenced an action against Yuill and Hill. Paragraphs 1 through 29 of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Carter v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Union State Bank v. WoellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Wall v. LewisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hust v. HustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Johnson v. HauglandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Peterson v. ZerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Gast Construction Co. v. Brighton PartnershipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hebron Public School District No. 13 of Morton County v. United States Gypsum Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Hellman v. ThieleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Bjorgen v. KinseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API