Legal Opinion
National Ass'n for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice v. Berch
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 19, 2013No. CV-12-1724-PHX-BSBPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BRIDGET S. BADE, United States Magistrate Judge.
In this matter, Plaintiffs, the National Association for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice (the NAAMJP), Allison Girvin (Girvin), Mark Anderson (Anderson), and Mark Kolman (Kolman), challenge Arizona Supreme Court Rule 34(f), which provides for admission on motion to the Arizona Bar (the AOM Rule). (Doc. 36.) Plaintiffs allege that Arizona’s AOM Rule is unconstitutional because it allows admission on motion for attorneys admitted in states having reciprocal admission rules for Arizona attorneys (reciprocity states), but requires…
2Cases cited128 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Manley v. Texas Southern UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Multijurisdictional Practice v. CastilleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Lawyers for Fair Reciprocal Admission v. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- In re ShoresSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
- Narvis Nonnette v. Gavin NewsomDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.