Legal Opinion
In re Shores
Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands
Decided October 30, 2013No. S. Ct. BA. No. 2013-0148, S. Ct. BA. No. 2013-0149PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
(October 30, 2013)
2Per curiam
These matters come before the Court pursuant to petitions for the pro hac vice admission of Ryan A. Shores and William L. Wehrum, Jr., two attorneys employed by the law firm of Hunton & Williams LLP, as well as an opposition filed by the Committee of Bar Examiners. For the reasons that follow, we deny the petitions.
I. BACKGROUND
On August 20, 2013, Joel H. Holt, Esq., a member of the Virgin Islands Bar, filed petitions to admit Shores and Wehrum pro hac vice to represent Diageo USVI, Inc. in Alleyne v. Cruzan Viril, Ltd., Super. Ct. Civ. No. 143/2013…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Leis v. FlyntSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Disabled in Action of Pennsylvania v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Gilbert v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Pate v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- In re NevinsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- In re the Virgin Islands Bar Association'sSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013