Legal Opinion

Bickford v. Tektronix, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 25, 1992No. A8910-05880; CA A65827PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for defendants on his claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and defamation. ORCP 47. We affirm.

We review the record in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the party opposing summary judgment. Stanfield v. Laccoarce, 288 Or 659, 665, 607 P2d 177 (1980). On October II, 1989, plaintiff was fired. He had worked for defendant Tektronix, Inc. (Tektronix), for 15 years and, at that time, was employed as a research engineer in its Solid State Research Laboratory (SSRL). During his employment, plaintiff had received 20 merit pay raises and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Walsh v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Madani v. Kendall Ford, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Stanfield v. LaccoarceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Benassi v. Georgia-PacificCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lund v. Arbonne International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. Downs v. Waremart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Johnson v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. Ishikawa v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2001
  5. Wallulis v. DymowskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API