Madani v. Kendall Ford, Inc.

This case concerns the sufficiency of the pleading of two tort claims: wrongful discharge and intentional infliction of severe emotional distress. We hold that plaintiffs amended complaint is not sufficient to pleád either tort.

Plaintiffs amended complaint alleges that defendant Kendall Ford, Inc., employed him as a salesperson and that defendant Dan David was his supervisor. In his claim for wrongful discharge, plaintiff further alleges that

“defendants instructed plaintiff to pull down his pants, and expose his buttocks, testicles, and penis to Defendant Dan David, and others. At the time of…