Wallulis v. Dymowski
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
In this action for defamation and intentional interference with economic relations, plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment. ORCP 47 C. Defendants cross-appeal from a judgment dismissing their claims for contribution and indemnity against third-party defendant American Telephone and Telegraph (AT&T) for failure to state a claim. ORCP 21 A(8).
Plaintiff worked for AT&T as a supervisor. In 1989, he began working at an AT&T facility in Beaverton. Defendant Dymowski was the union steward of the crew that plaintiff managed at that facility and a vice president of Communications Workers of America…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Old Dominion Branch No. 496 v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Jacksonville Bulk Terminals, Inc. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Local 926, International Union of Operating Engineers v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wallulis v. DymowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Gest v. Oregon AFL-CIOCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012