Legal Opinion

Wallulis v. Dymowski

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 10, 1995No. 9101-00424; CA A79806PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

In this action for defamation and intentional interference with economic relations, plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment. ORCP 47 C. Defendants cross-appeal from a judgment dismissing their claims for contribution and indemnity against third-party defendant American Telephone and Telegraph (AT&T) for failure to state a claim. ORCP 21 A(8).

Plaintiff worked for AT&T as a supervisor. In 1989, he began working at an AT&T facility in Beaverton. Defendant Dymowski was the union steward of the crew that plaintiff managed at that facility and a vice president of Communications Workers of America…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Old Dominion Branch No. 496 v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Jacksonville Bulk Terminals, Inc. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Local 926, International Union of Operating Engineers v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wallulis v. DymowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Gest v. Oregon AFL-CIOCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API