Black v. Donelson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Okmulgee .County; Ernest B. Hughes, Judge. Action by N. F.- Donelson against E. R. Black to rescind assignment of oil lease and to recover purchase price. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
P1TOHFOBD, J.
The defendant in error, plaintiff below, instituted this action against plaintiff in error, defendant below, for the purpose of rescinding an assignment of an interest in an oil and gas lease, and to recover the sum of $1,250, the amount paid for the interest so assigned. The parties will hereafter be designated as they appeared in the lower court.
The following facts are deducible from the evidence:
The defendant was the ’owner of an oil and gas mining lease on the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of section 24, township 14 north, range 14 east. The plaintiff ■began…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Giselman v. StarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Pierce Oil Corporation v. SchachtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Hogan v. LeeperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Holmes v. HalstidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Kelly v. ThueySupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Parkhill Truck Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- C & C Tile Co. v. Independent Sch. Dist. No. 7 of Tulsa Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Johnson v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Haught v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Moschos v. BaylessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.