Legal Opinion
Baba v. BOARD OF SUP'RS OF SAN FRANCISCO
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 29, 2004No. A103446PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAERLE, J.—
I. INTRODUCTION
The superior court issued a writ of mandamus barring enforcement of two provisions of the San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance. (S. F. Admin. Code, ch. 37 (hereafter, the Rent Ordinance).) The superior court found that section 37.10A(c) and section 37.10A(g) of the Rent Ordinance are unconstitutional on their face. We affirm.
II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A. The Rent Ordinance and the Daly Amendments
The Rent Ordinance was adopted in June 1979 in order to address problems created by a shortage of decent, safe and sanitary…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Kasky v. Nike, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gottlieb v. KestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Larson v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- San Joaquin County Public Conservator v. Joel E.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- County of Los Angeles v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Steiner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.