Legal Opinion

Farmers Bank of Clayton v. McCullers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Defendants were not permitted to show, as consideration for the deed in question, services rendered prior to 1 January, 1925, upon the theory, we presume, that recovery for such services was thought to be limited to three years next immediately preceding the commencement of the action, or the death of Nellie Horne McCullers. Wood v. Wood, 186 N. C., 559, 120 S. E., 194; Edwards v. Matthews, 196 N. C., 39, 144 S. E., 300; Miller v. Lash, 85 N. C., 51. In this we think there is error. The action is not to recover for such services and there is no plea of the statute of limitations.

True,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miller v. . LashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Winkler v. Killian.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Barbee v. . BarbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. Brown v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Dunn v. Currie.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ray Ex Rel. Ray v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Hodge v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Foster Ex Rel. Foster v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Davis v. . CockmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Owen v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API