Legal Opinion

Ray Ex Rel. Ray v. Robinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 1939PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Upon issues of fact, determinable alone by the jury, the plaintiff has been allowed to recover accordant with settled principles of law. Winkler v. Killian, 141 N. C., 575, 54 S. E., 540; Bank v. McCullers, 201 N. C., 412, 160 S. E., 497; Landreth v. Morris, 214 N. C., 619, 200 S. E., 378.

It is established by a number of decisions, that in the absence of some express or implied gratuity, usually arising out of family relationship or mutual interdependence, services rendered by one person to or for another, which are knowingly and voluntarily received, are presumed to be given and accepted in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Winkler v. Killian.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Brown v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Price v. . AskinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Callahan v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Landreth v. . MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McCraw v. LlewellynSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Scott v. United Carolina BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Stewart v. . WyrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Twiford v. WaterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Turner v. Marsh Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API