Legal Opinion

Davis v. . Cockman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 19, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The defendants contend that the questions involved are: (1) Should the motion for nonsuit at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence have been allowed? (2) Is the demurrer ore tenus interposed by the defendants good? We do not think defendants’ contentions can be sustained.

We think the confession of judgment was taken in accordance with the statute. C. S., Art. 24, secs. 623, 624, and 625.

C. S., 437, in part, is as follows: ‘'Within ten years an action — {1) Upon a judgment or decree of any court of the United States, or of any state or territory thereof, from the date of its rendition. No such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Taft v. . CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Farmers Bank of Clayton v. McCullersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCullen v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. McCullen v. . DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Harrell v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Grimes v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API