Legal Opinion

Hodge v. Perry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1961No. 456PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Careful consideration of each of defendant’s twenty-one assignments of error fails to disclose error deemed sufficiently prejudicial to justify the award of a new trial.

However, assignments Nos. 12, 13,14 and 16, based on exceptions to portions of the charge, merit discussion. All present the same question of law. .

Decedent died May 19, 1959. Defendant qualified as administrator May 25, 1959. This action was instituted April 11, 1960.

The court instructed the jury that, if plaintiff was entitled to recover, she was entitled to recover the reasonable value of the services she rendered the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miller v. . LashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Brown v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. McCurry v. . PurgasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Stewart v. . WyrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Humphrey v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. McCraw v. LlewellynSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Doub v. HauserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Lassiter v. FaisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Shaw v. MintzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API