Legal Opinion

Brown v. . Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 1928PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClakksoN, J.

The questions involved:

1. Was the evidence offered by the plaintiff of an express contract to make testamentary provision for the plaintiff sufficient to be submitted to the jury? We think not.

In Overall Co. v. Holmes, 186 N. C., at p. 431-2, it is said: “A contract is ‘an agreement, upon sufficient consideration, to do or not to do a particular thing.’ 2 Blackstone Com., p. 442. There is no contract unless the parties assent to the same thing in the same sense. A contract is the agreement of two minds — the coming together of two minds oii a thing done or to be done. ‘A contract, express or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miller v. . LashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Freeman v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Shore v. . HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Helsabeck v. . DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Dodson v. . McAdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Coley v. . DalrympleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Johnson v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. McCraw v. LlewellynSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Elliott v. Duke University, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Jackson v. BobbittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API