The Blackfeet Tribe v. United States Department of Labor
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
The Blackfeet Indian Tribe (the Tribe) seeks review of a ruling by an administrative law judge (AU), adopted by the Secretary of Labor (the Secretary), dismissing as untimely the Tribe’s appeal from a decision requiring the Tribe to reimburse over $300,000 in grant money previously distributed to it under the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA), 92 Stat. 1909-2017 (1978) (formerly codified at 29 U.S.C. §§ 801-999 (Supp. V 1981)). The AU had jurisdiction to dismiss the appeal pursuant to CETA § 106(i)(2) (formerly codified at 29 U.S.C. § 8160(2)). We have…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brock v. Pierce CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Marathon Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Nance v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Environment Now! v. EspyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994
- Center for Biological Diversity v. NortonDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- Oregon Natural Resources Council v. LoweDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1993
- Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1987
- Center for Biological Diversity v. KempthorneDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.