Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Environment Now! v. Espy

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 23, 1994No. CV-F-94-5474 OWWPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE:

1) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE

2) PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

3) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WANGER, District Judge.

I

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Environment Now!, Tulare County Audubon Society, Plumas Forest Project and Forest Aert have filed this action against defendants Mike Espy, Secretary of Agriculture, Jack Ward Thomas, Chief, United States Forest Service, Ronald E. Stewart, Regional Forester Region 5, and Sandra Key, Forest Supervisor, Sequoia National Forest, (collectively, the “Federal Defendants”) concerning the harvesting of…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cactus Corner, LLC v. U.S. Dept. of AgricultureDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2004
  2. San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. BadgleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2000
  3. Reservation Ranch v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  4. Center for Biological Diversity v. NortonDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
  5. Habitat Education Center, Inc. v. BosworthDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API