Legal Opinion
Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey City
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 9, 1944No. 767PublishedCited by 332 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson
This is a direct appeal by the Interstate Commerce Commission, whose orders the District Court of New Jersey has set aside, and by the Hudson & Manhattan Railroad *505Company, whose rates are subject to the enjoined orders. Respondents are the City of Jersey City and the Price Administrator, who intervened under powers duly delegated to him pursuant to the Emergency Price Control Act of 19421 and the Inflation Control or Stabilization Act of 1942.2
The Hudson & Manhattan Railroad Company owns about 8.5 miles of electric railway, of which all but 0.63 mile is underground. It has two double-track…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by332 opinions
- Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Catawba County v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Piedmont Heights Civic Club, Inc. v. Thomas D. MorelandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Cross-Appellee v. Nelson Bunker Hunt, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Berry v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
327 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.