Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Christensen v. Hinkle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1932No. 24046. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The relator, by this proceeding, seeks a writ of prohibition directed against the secretary of state.

In 1930, the relator was elected to the state senate from the then district No. 16, which was composed of Klickitat and Skamania counties. His term of office was four years. At the same election at which relator was elected, initiative measure No. 57 (chapter 2 of the Laws of 1931, p. 31) was passed by a direct vote of the people. This measure, as indicated by its title, was an act relating to and providing for the number, district and apportionment of the members of the senate and house of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Snowball v. PendegastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. State Ex Rel. Miller v. HinkleWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State ex rel. Williams v. MeyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kelsh v. JaegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re Apportionment Law, Etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1982
  3. State Ex Rel. Herr v. LaxaltNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API