Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Snowball v. Pendegast

California Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1892No. Nos. 15184, 15185PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Applications to the Supreme Court for writs of mandate. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

— These are original applications for writs of mandate.

The relator is a citizen of Yolo County, and possesses the qualifications entitling him to represent the senatorial district of which Yolo County is a part. He claims that under the constitution and laws of the state a senator is to be elected in said district at the approaching election, and he has been regularly nominated as a candidate for the office. He has made formal demand upon the governor to issue his proclamation for the election of a senator from said district, and upon the county clerk of Yolo County to file his certificate of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McPherson v. BartlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Mutual Life Insurance v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Wheeler v. HerbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Legislature v. ReineckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. People Ex Rel. Salazar v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API