In Re Apportionment Law, Etc.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
414 So.2d 1040 (1982)
In re APPORTIONMENT LAW APPEARING AS SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION 1 E, 1982 SPECIAL APPORTIONMENT SESSION; CONSTITUTIONALITY VEL NON.
No. 61933.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 26, 1982.
On the Merits May 12, 1982.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Kendrick Tucker, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Mitchell D. Franks and Gerald B. Curington, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tallahassee, for Atty. Gen. of the State of Fla., petitioner.
Thomas W. McAliley of Beckham & McAliley, Miami, and Neal P. Rutledge, Washington, D.C., for the Florida Senate; Barry Richard of Roberts, Baggett, LaFace, Richard & Wiser, Tallahassee,…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent; Concurrence · Boyd; Concurrence · Ehrlich; Concurrence · Boyd; Concurrence · McDONALD; Concurrence · Ehrlich; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Sundberg; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Adkins.
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- White v. RegesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lawyer v. Department of JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- DeGrandy v. WetherellDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1992
- In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176Supreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re Standards for Establishing Legislative District BoundariesSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- In Re Senate Joint Resolution 2GSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.