Legal Opinion
Bank of America v. Cory
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 1985No. Civ. 20871PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EVANS, J.
Following protracted and convoluted litigation, this appeal places at issue the question of the applicability of a statute of limitations to the California Unclaimed Property Law (Code Civ. Proc., § 1500 et seq., hereafter UPL) and the enforcement of the UPL or lack thereof by the State Controller, and the propriety and amount of interest and/or penalty assessed upon an order of escheat. Bank of America (Bank), as appellant and cross-respondent in No. 257509, addresses the questions of the applicability of a statute of limitations to the UPL, its retroactivity, and the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Fuentes v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Riggs National Bank of Washington, D.C. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Richmond v. Dart Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Jordan v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Beasley v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Collins v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.