Richmond v. Dart Industries, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
—Plaintiffs Harold Richmond and his class of 2,600 purchasers of land at Tahoe-Donner subdivision appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendant Dart Industries, Inc., following a four month jury trial. The jury returned a general verdict for defendant on plaintiffs’ claims that defendant committed fraud and violated the Subdivided Lands Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 11000 et seq.) by misrepresenting the availability of water and sewer services at Tahoe-Donner. (All further statutory references are to the Business and Professions Code unless otherwise indicated.) Following…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Richmond v. Dart Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
- Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- McLaughlin v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Board of Administration v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Bullock v. Phillip Morris USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Johnson v. Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Bihun v. AT & T Information Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.