Legal Opinion

Lords v. Newman

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1984No. 84-141PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Haswell

The defendants appeal from a default judgment entered by the Flathead County District Court.

Appellant, Josephine Newman, purchased the San Rose Motel near Kalispell, Montana, from the plaintiffs in April 1982. Part of the purchase price was a $10,000 promissory note executed by Newman and her parents, W.D. Webb and Ida May Webb. Newman made one monthly payment on the note. When the second payment came due, she deducted the cost of repairing certain items at the motel and sent a check for the difference to the sellers. The Lords rejected the payment, and the present action for collection was…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Averbeck Realty, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Carroll v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Orange Empire National Bank v. KirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Brothers v. BrothersMontana Supreme Court · 1924

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Essex Insurance v. Moose's Saloon, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Blume v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Graham v. MacKMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Maulding v. HardmanMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Re the Marriage of CastorMontana Supreme Court · 1991

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API