Legal Opinion

Maulding v. Hardman

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1993No. 92-409PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

This is an appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, Lewis and Clark County, the Honorable Jeffrey M. Sherlock presiding. Appellant Robert Hardman (Hardman) appeals from the denial of his Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment which was deemed denied under Rule 60(c), M.R.Civ.P, because the District Court failed to rule on it within 45 days of its filing. We set aside the default judgment and remand for a trial on the merits.

The sole issue is whether Hardman is entitled to have the default judgment set aside in favor of a trial on the merits.

In the early morning hours of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cabalceta v. Standard Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Lords v. NewmanMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hill v. Squibb & Sons, ERMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Blume v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Turk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Busta Ex Rel. Busta v. Columbus Hospital Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Karlen v. EvansMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Sandman v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. MONTANA PROFESSIONAL SPORTS, LLC. v. National Indoor Football League, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Estate of Nielsen v. PardisMontana Supreme Court · 1994

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API