Legal Opinion

Heden v. Hill

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided June 28, 1996No. H-94-cv-4095PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER OF ADOPTION

HITTNER, District Judge.

This court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge signed March 8, 1996. The court finds the Memorandum and Recommendation should be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the court’s Memorandum and Order. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Motion of Defendant Groves to Dismiss Count One of Plaintiffs Petition is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

With respect to Heden’s request for Groves to be directed to remove defendant Dale Hill’s name from all papers in the application for the patent to ensure that the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Manuel M. Fernandez-Montes v. Allied Pilots Association, Fred Vogel, and C.R. PatyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. Jimmy Blackburn v. Marshall City OfCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kucharczyk v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API