Legal Opinion

Edwin G. Bemis v. Chevron Research Company, Standard Oil Company of California, and Stanley O. Hutchison

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 2, 1979No. 76-3597PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

On March 12, 1976, the appellant, Bemis, filed a four-count complaint in the district court. The subject matter of the complaint was United States Patent No. 3,720,264 (hereinafter, “patent”); the defendants named in the complaint were Hutchison, the named inventor of the method and apparatus protected by the patent, Chevron Research Company, the assignee of the patent, and Standard Oil Company of California. The action was brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a), as “arising under the Patent Laws of the United States”.

The gravamen of the complaint was that Bemis, rather than Hutchison,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Rival Manufacturing Company v. Dazey Products CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1973

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. David D. Stark, M.D. v. Advanced Magnetics, Inc., Jerome Goldstein, Ernest v. Groman, and Lee JosephsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. Eldon Industries, Inc. v. Rubbermaid, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  3. Dee v. AukermanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
  4. Stark v. Advanced Magnetics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
  5. McMurray v. HarwoodDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API