McV Inc. v. King-Seeley Thermos Company
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
MCV, Inc., appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, No. 86-C-4180 (Feb. 10,1988), dismissing MCV’s complaint for a determination of inventorship and co-ownership, and for correction of inventorship of U.S. Patent No. 4,600,148. The district court held MCV equitably estopped from asserting a co-inventorship claim, and not entitled to co-inventorship status. We agree that MCV is equitably estopped, and affirm on that basis; we do not address the co-inventorship claim except to the extent necessary to our…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Pratt v. Paris Gas Light & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Arrowhead Industrial Water, Inc. v. Ecolochem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Lane & Bodley Co. v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Pannu v. Iolab Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Eli Lilly and Company v. Aradigm Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- National Cable Television Association, Inc. v. American Cinema Editors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Fina Oil and Chemical Co. And Fina Technology, Inc. v. John A. Ewen v. Abbas Razavi, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.