Estate of Polushkin Ex Rel. Polushkin v. Maw
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
In October 1989 Patroky Polushkin purchased an Upper Cook Inlet salmon drift fishery permit from Roland Maw. An addendum to the purchase agreement provided that Maw would retain all rights to claims or benefits resulting from the March 1989 Exxon VampEz oil spill that were associated with the permit. The question presented in this case is whether Maw is entitled to damages resulting from the oil spill that Polushkin suffered after the transfer of the permit. We answer in the negative because the language of the addendum is ambiguous, extrinsic…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Peterson v. WirumAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. O'KELLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Norville v. Carr-Gottstein Foods Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re the Glacier Bay. United Cook Inlet Drift Assoc., an Alaska Cooperative Corp., on Behalf of a Class Comprising Its Members and Its Members' Deckhands v. Trinidad Corporation West of England Ship Owners Mark Hawker Kee Leasing Co. Mathiasen's Tanker Industries, Inc. Glacier Bay Transportation Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Rego v. DeckerAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cook v. CookAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Wasser & Winters Co. v. Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America), Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Flint Hills Resources Alaska, LLC v. Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Nautilus Marine Enterprises, Inc. v. Exxon Mobil CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- O'CONNELL v. WillAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.