Legal Opinion
O'CONNELL v. Will
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided October 28, 2011No. S-13540PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
In 2002 Kevin O'Connell was awarded damages against Anthony and Paulette Will for the Wills failure to pay a promissory note. Under the attorney's fee provision in the note, O'Connell was also awarded full attorney's fees and costs. After O'Connell's attorney engaged in post-judgment collection efforts, Anthony Will paid the judgment. In 2009 Anthony Will filed a request for an order that the judgment in the case had been satisfied, and the superior court granted the motion. O'Connell filed a motion seeking a further award of attorney's fees, arguing…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Rockstad v. EriksonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Keller v. FrenchAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Reid v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Hughes v. Foster Wheeler Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Western Pioneer, Inc. v. Harbor Enterprises, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alaska Fur Gallery, Inc. v. First National Bank AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Graham v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Schweitzer v. Salamatof Air Park Subdivision Owners, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Alaska Fur Gallery, Inc. v. First National Bank AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Aspen American Insurance Company v. MorrowDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.