Legal Opinion

Sherbeck v. Estate of Lyman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 23, 1976No. 1718-2PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrie, C.J.

This is an action for damages and partial rescission upon the ground of fraud in the sale of real estate. Defendants denied the material allegations of the complaint and set up the affirmative defense of the statute of limitations. The trial court dismissed the complaint against defendant Lyman on the basis of the running of the statute of limitations and dismissed the complaint against defendant Kolsters due to lack of sufficient evidence of fraud. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

The facts necessary to our decision may be summarized as follows:

In January 1963, the plaintiff’s sister, Mrs. June…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McCutcheon v. BrownfieldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  2. Sylvester v. ImhoffWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau of Olympia, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Conaway v. Co-Operative HomebuildersWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Ackerson v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Interlake Porsche + Audi, Inc. v. BucholzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  2. Hudson v. CondonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Hudson v. CondonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Vigil v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  5. Norris v. Church & Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API