Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Condon
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 10, 2000No. 18715-2-IIIPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
6 P.3d 615 (2000)
101 Wash.App. 866
Phillip M. HUDSON, D.D.S. and Jan Hudson, husband and wife, Appellants,
v.
Donald F. CONDON, M.D. and Elizabeth Condon, husband and wife, and the marital community thereof, Respondents and Cross-Appellants.
No. 18715-2-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Seven.
August 10, 2000.
David A. Kulisch, Randall & Danskin, Spokane, for Appellants.
Erika Balazs, Lukins & Annis, Spokane, for Respondents.
SCHULTHEIS, J.
Phillip Hudson's claims against former partner Donald Condon for breaches of fiduciary duty, the lease and the partnership agreement and for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Leingang v. PIERCE CO. MED. BUREAU, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Leingang v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Haslund v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Allen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Green v. A.P.C.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Coto Settlement v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Shepard v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Burns v. McClintonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Burns v. McClintonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Putzier v. Ace Hardware Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.