Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Condon
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 10, 2000No. 18715-2-IIIPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.
Phillip Hudson’s claims against former partner Donald Condon for breaches of fiduciary duty, the lease and the partnership agreement and for reformation of the lease were dismissed on summary judgment. On appeal Dr. Hudson contends the trial court erred in ruling that the relevant statutes of limitations barred all his causes of action. We affirm.
*869Facts
In September 1982 Dr. Hudson and Dr. Condon executed a written partnership agreement for mutual ownership and management of a medical/dental building. The partners intended to lease offices in the building (the Center) for their own practices,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Leingang v. PIERCE CO. MED. BUREAU, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Leingang v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Haslund v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Allen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Green v. A.P.C.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Coto Settlement v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Shepard v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Hudson v. CondonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Burns v. McClintonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Burns v. McClintonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.