Legal Opinion
McManus v. Otis
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 22, 1943No. Civ. 2998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
The appeal is by plaintiff and appellant Pearl M. McManus from a judgment in favor of the defendants and respondents H. W. Otis and Smoke Tree Properties, Inc., a corporation, alias Mardo Corporation.
The action is one for injunction and to recover damages for injuries to real property alleged in the complaint to have been sustained as a result of the construction by defendants of two parallel dykes whereby the “rain and storm waters” flowing out of Palm Canyon and over the alluvial cone thereof were in 1937 and 1938 collected and concentrated into a narrow channel and so diverted from their…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
- San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gastine v. EwingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Sun Underwriters Ins. Co. of New York v. BunkleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Tri-Chem, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Williams v. Pacific Coast Aggregates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Dykzeul v. MansurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944