Legal Opinion

Consolidated Cork Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 16, 1965No. C.D. 2512PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case consisted, as imported, of 126 bales of granulated cork, of average weight of 175 pounds per bale. It was imported from Portugal on or about November 28, 1962, and was assessed with duty at 3 cents per pound under paragraph 1511 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as granulated cork, weighing not over 6 pounds per cubic foot uncompressed. It is claimed to be dutiable under said paragraph at 1 cent per pound as other granulated cork.

The pertinent parts of said paragraph 1511 are as follows:

Par. 1511. * * * clean, refined, or purified, granulated or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Edson Keith & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. United States v. Gage Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Draper & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. Gertzen v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. United States v. LozanoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aluminum Co. of America v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. Libas, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  3. Consolidated Cork Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Albert F. Maurer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. Aluminum Co. of America v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API